Easily create 100% industry-standard PDF files. The SAFA Guidelines are able to be followed by a wide range of actors, for multiple purposes and at different levels. SAFAapp FAO 2015 - Sociologia - 5 - Passei Direto SAFA provides a polygon of a production unit that can only be visually interpreted and compared with other farms. Questionnaire C was applied to 30 farm workers and comprised 66 questions divided in two sections. PDF HOW TO FRAME A SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT QUESTION - Squarespace For atmosphere, all M units and IS1 had large amounts of machinery and presented few practices to improve air quality, thus rated as unacceptable. [20] used the SAFA Smallholders App, developed to further expand the applicability and implementation of the SAFA Guidelines. The sustainability performance calculated in this study (Table 2) suggests that, under the SAFA framework, NS farms are the most sustainable systems in the Mexican tropics, possibly due to the positive effects on the themes Participation, Land, Biodiversity and Cultural Diversity. While stakeholders who do not have a proper sustainability tool have embraced SAFA entirely, large private companies (who already have their own sustainability tool) tend to include parts of SAFA into their schemes, with a view to better compete with other businesses. comparison conducted in the previous section, regarding economic resilience, identifies overlaps and differences between SAFA Smallholder App and CAGF-2007. and G.S. Safa foundation - kopavguldrfgxu.netlify.app The SAFA Smallholders App version 2.0.0 and User's Manual are downloadable from Google Store as well as from here. Hence, it is important for workers receive education to fully understand and assimilate the importance of their rights, in order to demand improvements on their benefits, and that farm owners are required to provide such knowledge. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, Supported O.S are 4.0 and up. Context 1 . We would also like to thank to Javier Solorio Snchez and Luis Ramrez y Aviles both academic researcher from UADY, and Jorge Canul for introducing us to the producers and making it possible to work with them. Smallholders App Users Manual Version 2.0.0 (For Androind 4.0 and Higher), Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1375236/FULLTEXT01.pdf, http://www1.clermont.inra.fr/wq/index.php?id=simul&new=1, https://www.profepa.gob.mx/innovaportal/file/435/1/NOM_059_SEMARNAT_2010.pdf, https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/9924/1/saludas_cohi_m_170124.pdf, https://www.milenio.com/negocios/plazo-aretado-ganado-vence-febrero-2017, NO3NO4 relation and total organic phosphorus content, NO3NO4 relation and total organic carbon content. The SAFA Smallholders App is a free of charge mobile application (version 2.0.0) for Android 4.0 and higher, created by FAO and partners to address the specificities of smallholders, following. Therefore, to better identify farms with better or worse sustainability performance, the integrated procedure was as followed: A flux diagram summarizing the methodological application of the SAFA framework is present in Figure 1: Timeline representing the procedure of the SAFA (Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems) methodological application for the construction of the sustainability polygons. Theme: Materials and Energy; Dimension: Environmental Integrity. environmental, social, economic and governance) and it assesses performance in one area of sustainability in relative terms, as interdependent with performance in other areas. Sustainability polygons for farms representing Monoculture systems (MS). This study proved to be helpful to identify differences between systems, create awareness among producers in relation to sustainable management and identify those areas that need to be improved to achieve holistic sustainability goals. All other farms were rated as moderate because they were not present in different kinds of markets and lacked diversification. On the first visit, 35 days per farm were occupied to characterize each unit and apply questionnaires A, B and C. The second visit was to apply questionnaire D. The information obtained was used to feed the application SAFA tool version 2.1.50, producing the corresponding SAFA sustainability polygons further presented in the Results section. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted The IS farms were: Kakalnah in Tzucacab (IS1); Kampepem in Merida (IS2); Golondrinas in Tizimin (IS3), Monoculture System (MS): conventional grazing system based on monoculture of grass (Mancera et al., 2018). assessed the sustainability performance of three types of management systems present in cattle farms in Indonesia: managed only with family labor, managed only with hired labor and managed with hired labor and the head of the family working as the middleman in the local marketing system. The founding document of SAFA is the SAFA Guidelines. In: Duran R., Mndez M., editors. Contact us | Terms and Conditions | Scam Alert, Greening the Economy with Agriculture (GEA). Percentages were rounded down when decimals were 0.5 and rounded up when decimals 0.6. ATTENDANCE MONITORING AND REMUNERATION WITH ANDROID - ResearchGate Intensified Silvopastoral Systems (IS) integrate technical knowledge, such as the inclusion of specific plant species. Therefore, it is important that farmers also have enough silvopastoral knowledge to put their benefits into practice. The Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) tool 2.0.0 for smallholders was chosen as it evaluates the productive unit as a whole using environmental, social, economic, and governance indicators and is tailored for small-scale production. large enterprises). It is also worth mentioning that silvopastoral systems, native or intensified, are in fact, more complex than a mere classification in terms of intensification. This project was kindly funded by Germany and developed in collaboration with the Committee on Sustainability Assessments (COSA), Grameen Foundation and Soil & More. Tools Apps Download SAFA Smallholders APK SAFA Smallholders APK 2.0.0 by Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN Jan 14, 2016 Old Versions Download APK (6.8 MB) Broom D., Galindo F., Murgueitio E. Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals. Hanisch A.L., Negrelle R.R., Bonatto R.A., Nimmo E.R., Lacerda A.E.B. Veja grtis o arquivo SAFAapp FAO 2015 enviado para a disciplina de Sociologia Categoria: Trabalho - 5 - 83953229 For Decent Livelihood, all NS and IS farms, and MS1, were rated as limited whereas the rest as moderate, as workers receive limited support in terms of training and fair salary. We recommend caution when installing it. Tradues em contexto de "definio e classificao das variveis" en portugus-ingls da Reverso Context : Semana 11: Variveis aleatrias - definio e classificao das variveis. NS = Native Silvopastoral; IS = Intensive Silvopastoral; M = Monoculture. Furthermore, there are no data on the features of these systems in the economic, social and environmental dimension, which are paramount to understanding and successfully implementing them. Polygons are aimed to synthetize and facilitate visualization or results. PDF Home | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations The choice of the sustainability assessment tool matters: Differences in thematic scope and assessment results. News; Reviews; . and F.G.; writingreview and editing, F.P.-L., K.F.M. In addition to contributing to the refinement of the indicators, the Grameen Foundation used its networks and existing experience with mobile technological development programmes at the community levelto providefeedback and field testing of the SAFA Smallholders; field testing has been performed in Colombia and Kenya, with over 439 farmers. The sub-humid native rainforest in Yucatan is one of the most endangered in Mexico. Our hypothesis is that NS and IS will have a better sustainability performance than MS, with emphasis in the environmental dimension, due to the benefits that silvopastoral systems provide to animal welfare, wildlife diversity and soil quality. Amndola L., Solorio F., Ku-Vera J., Amndola-Massiotti R., Zarza H., Galindo F. Social behaviour of cattle in tropical silvopastoral and monoculture systems. NS and IS are alternatives to Monoculture Systems (MS), which are intrinsically related to a reduction of ecosystem services [10]. Despite these differences, traditional and intensive silvopastoral systems were categorized as important options for sustainable development when the SAFA app was used, since they had, respectively, 65% and 86% of . SAFA is not a certification standard as it does not prescribe strict specifications for sustainability management. Three expert consultations, two E-fora that invited public contributions, and 30 pilot studies provided the necessary knowledge for shaping the Guidelines. Especies Nativas de Mxico de Flora y Fauna Silvestres. NS farms and IS2 had the highest proportion of live fences and fruit trees and had good Biodiversity ratings. Likewise, for the theme Water, all units lacked clear goals to decrease water pollution or increase water efficiency and were rated as limited. ; formal analysis, F.P.-L. and K.F.M. Despite these differences, traditional and intensive silvopastoral systems were categorized as important options for sustainable development when the SAFA app was used, since they had, respectively, 65% and 86% of indicator questions evaluated as good [20]. In contrast traditional or Native Silvopastoral Systems (NS) are not actively managed but are more likely to include native flora and fauna. While these examples have used SAFA to evaluate differences in the sustainable performance of cattle farming and in silvopastoral systems, this tool needs to be further validated under a diversity of conditions and in the presence of different landscape structures [21], as it could be used to promote the transition and implementation of systems such as silvopastorals. Publishers Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. NS had limited ratings for Decent Livelihood, due to poor training and underpay. For Holistic Management, all IS farms, NS3 and M2 were rated as good, as they considered economic, social and environmental impacts to perform integral evaluations of their performance, in contrast with other farms. This is the first study undertaking the comparison of NS, IS and MS with the use of the SAFA framework in the Mexican tropics livestock production sector. Hence, their sustainability performance and assessment may differ at different time points, adding complexity to its evaluation. For Economic Resilience, ratings were mainly associated to a local market economy, to the existence of investment goals and to production diversification. With 4 Votes and 5.0 Ratings for the SAFA CELLULER shows its popularity in Play Store. Furthermore, the information generated by this study provides useful information on the approach of assessing trade-offs and synergies by using protocols such as the SAFA framework. Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems Smallholders He maintains RSPO certified palm producers will have no trouble meeting new EU anti-deforestation . Group work was perceived as important for Accountability and Corporate Ethics, as most farms lacked explicit communication to all workers. SAFA ratings were assigned as follows: best = 5 spp; good = 4 spp; moderate = 3 spp; limited = 2 spp; unacceptable = 1 spp. NS systems had limited paddock manipulation (i.e., clearing, burning, etc.) This is the first comparative study using SAFA to evaluate differences in farming systems in the Mexican tropics, and it provides valuable information to generate policies and incentives for sustainable silvopastoral production, as well as to develop new evaluation tools that are more appropriate for this region. Questionnaire D was applied to members of the local community where farms were located and included 30 questions on the following topics: commitment to sustainability-related themes, commitment with the community and citizen participation, health and security in relation to the farm, relationship between the farm and the community and animal welfare. The SAFA Tool can be used by anyone wanting to conduct an assessment against the SAFA Guidelines at the supply chain level (e.g. In 2011, 21% of Latin America lived in rural areas, where livestock represents food sources and means to improve their economic and social situation [4]. SAFA main goal is the assessment of organizations through the evaluation of components of the supply chain. Similarly, no clear goals to decrease water pollution or increase water efficiency were present in the units. The relevant sustainability subthemes in the farm are recognized. After 2017, new traceability conditions will allow better rating for this theme. In: Aguirre A.A., Sukumar R., editors. The application is a practical tool for smallholders and field workers for assessing the sustainaility of agricultural farms, including good governance, environmental integrity, economic . Received 2020 Oct 24; Accepted 2020 Nov 13. Animal Welfare best and good ratings are obtained when prevention rather than use of veterinary medicines is favored [13] and when animals health records, vaccinations and attendance to animal welfare workshops are implemented [19]. For Equity, farms NS1 and IS2 were rated as best, whereas IS1, NS2 and M2 had good ratings and the rest, moderate. For Rule of Law, all farms rated good. This includes the development of a set of 44 indicators that are both highly relevant and practical to smallholder farmers, as well as an application forconducting assessments through smart phones and tablets. Moderate rated farms did not promote emphatically indigenous values, but did not present discrimination, which M1 did, by identifying some workers as mayeros, a derogatory name used for Mayan persons that cannot speak Spanish fluidly. SAFA is short for the Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems. The themes found at the category moderate were eliminated as they did not provide relevant information for the interpretation, Percentages of themes in rating categories labeled as positive and negative were added up, resulting in percentages of positive valuations, and negative valuations, Once calculated, farms were listed according to the calculated percentages of positive valuations: the highest positive valuation percentage was assigned to the top of the list while the lowest to the bottom. boundaries set, data sources, indicator selection, ratings etc.). Farms obtained moderate ratings for Participation when owners made decisions alone (IS3) or when poor communication between owners and employees was prevalent (MS1). In: Peri P.L., Dube F., Varella A., editors. The better ratings of NS systems compared to IS in this study contradict previous findings, where intensified silvopastoral systems in Brazil were better rated than silvopastoral traditional systems when their sustainability performance was evaluated using the SAFA smallholders app [20]. Silvopastoral Systems in Southern South America. ; validation, F.P.-L., F.G., J.C., J.S. For the dimension Social Well-Being, low ratings in Decent Livelihood relate to the limited support workers receive in terms of training and fair salary as observed in other cattle smallholders, which rated moderate when no training opportunities and no scores for overtime payment were present [19]. ; funding acquisition, F.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. For Human Safety and Health farms NS1, NS2 and IS2 were rated best, and the rest as moderate, with best rated farms presenting the best working conditions and a clean and healthy environment. and G.S. The SAFA Smallholders App is a free mobile application for Android cell phones and tablets from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol for Cattle. Pursuing sustainability through multi-stakeholder collaboration: A description of the governance, actions, and perceived impacts of the roundtables for sustainable beef. Farmers perceptions of silvopastoral system promotion in Quindo, Colombia. 6. Sustainability assessment of small-scale agriculture producers Download APK . 2021 Jan; 11 (1): 109. Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems SAFA. Version 3.0. Subtheme: Material use. This project was kindly funded by Germany and developed in collaboration with the Committee on Sustainability Assessments (COSA), Grameen Foundation and Soil & More. 4. Our objective is that the results obtained allow the identification of possible strategies to improve sustainability performance, as well as to evaluate the utility of the SAFA framework in the Mexican tropics. The tool can also be used to of the food sector. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal SAFA Smallholders App 2.0.0. Understand your key performance issues (strengths, weaknesses). and G.S. In this regard, silvopastoral systems are known for bringing diversification to farms, which in turn creates greater economic security for producers [40,41] and it was expected for silvopastoral systems to be positively rated in all cases for this theme. This comparison is important, as it has been recognized that the SAFA Smallholders App, even when adjusted from the SAFA Framework to evaluate key sustainability components, can only provide a general picture of sustainability compared to the SAFA Framework, which generates a deeper interpretation of indicators, such as those related to farmers adaptation to climate change, or the time invested in farm activities [14].

Costa Mesa School District Staff, Fox Hollow Farm Herb Baumeister, Dosewallips State Park, Articles S